Exercise Physiology: Theory and Application to Fitness and Performance

508 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1990, received 508 indexed citations. Written by Scott K. Powers and Edward T. Howley covering the research area of Orthopedics and Sports Medicine. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (172 citations), Physiology (150 citations) and Complementary and alternative medicine (140 citations). Published in .

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w40005569 →

Countries where authors are citing Exercise Physiology: Theory and Application to Fitness and Performance

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Exercise Physiology: Theory and Application to Fitness and Performance. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Exercise Physiology: Theory and Application to Fitness and Performance with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Exercise Physiology: Theory and Application to Fitness and Performance more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Exercise Physiology: Theory and Application to Fitness and Performance

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Exercise Physiology: Theory and Application to Fitness and Performance. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Exercise Physiology: Theory and Application to Fitness and Performance.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w40005569.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026