Identification of gamma-E-antibodies as a carrier of reaginic activity.
Impact in
- Physiology 170
Classified as
- Journal
- PubMed
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w39710410 →Countries where authors are citing Identification of gamma-E-antibodies as a carrier of reaginic activity.
This map shows the geographic impact of Identification of gamma-E-antibodies as a carrier of reaginic activity.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Identification of gamma-E-antibodies as a carrier of reaginic activity. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Identification of gamma-E-antibodies as a carrier of reaginic activity. more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Identification of gamma-E-antibodies as a carrier of reaginic activity.
This network shows the impact of Identification of gamma-E-antibodies as a carrier of reaginic activity.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Identification of gamma-E-antibodies as a carrier of reaginic activity..
About Identification of gamma-E-antibodies as a carrier of reaginic activity.
This paper, published in 1967, received 410 indexed citations . Written by Kimishige Ishizaka and Teruko Ishizaka covering the research area of Immunology, Small Animals and Hematology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Immunology and Allergy (219 citations), Physiology (170 citations), Immunology (132 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (77 citations) and Dermatology (59 citations). Published in PubMed.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w39710410.