Psychological Testing and Assessment: An Introduction to Tests and Measurement
- Authors
- Ronald Jay CohenMark E. Swerdlik
- Journal
- Medical Entomology and Zoology
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w38108594 →Countries where authors are citing Psychological Testing and Assessment: An Introduction to Tests and Measurement
This map shows the geographic impact of Psychological Testing and Assessment: An Introduction to Tests and Measurement. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Psychological Testing and Assessment: An Introduction to Tests and Measurement with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Psychological Testing and Assessment: An Introduction to Tests and Measurement more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Psychological Testing and Assessment: An Introduction to Tests and Measurement
This network shows the impact of Psychological Testing and Assessment: An Introduction to Tests and Measurement. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Psychological Testing and Assessment: An Introduction to Tests and Measurement.
About Psychological Testing and Assessment: An Introduction to Tests and Measurement
This paper, published in 1992, received 612 indexed citations . Written by Ronald Jay Cohen and Mark E. Swerdlik. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Education (161 citations), Clinical Psychology (142 citations) and Social Psychology (116 citations). Published in Medical Entomology and Zoology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w38108594.