Corporate social disclosure practice: a comparative international analysis
- Authors
- James GuthrieLee D. Parker
- Journal
- ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam)
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w3803168 →Countries where authors are citing Corporate social disclosure practice: a comparative international analysis
This map shows the geographic impact of Corporate social disclosure practice: a comparative international analysis. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Corporate social disclosure practice: a comparative international analysis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Corporate social disclosure practice: a comparative international analysis more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Corporate social disclosure practice: a comparative international analysis
This network shows the impact of Corporate social disclosure practice: a comparative international analysis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Corporate social disclosure practice: a comparative international analysis.
About Corporate social disclosure practice: a comparative international analysis
This paper, published in 1990, received 764 indexed citations . Written by James Guthrie and Lee D. Parker. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Strategy and Management (636 citations), Marketing (365 citations) and Accounting (331 citations). Published in ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w3803168.