Moral stages: A current formulation and a response to critics.
- Journal
- DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library)
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w37795618 →Countries where authors are citing Moral stages: A current formulation and a response to critics.
This map shows the geographic impact of Moral stages: A current formulation and a response to critics.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Moral stages: A current formulation and a response to critics. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Moral stages: A current formulation and a response to critics. more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Moral stages: A current formulation and a response to critics.
This network shows the impact of Moral stages: A current formulation and a response to critics.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Moral stages: A current formulation and a response to critics..
About Moral stages: A current formulation and a response to critics.
This paper, published in 1983, received 458 indexed citations . Written by Lawrence Kohlberg and Charles G. Levine. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Cognitive Neuroscience (161 citations), Information Systems and Management (160 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (139 citations). Published in DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w37795618.