METODOLOGI PENELITIAN BISNIS : Untuk Akuntansi dan Manajemen

272 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2014, received 272 indexed citations. Written by Arfan Ikhsan covering the research area of Management Information Systems, Artificial Intelligence and Information Systems. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Accounting (126 citations), Strategy and Management (93 citations) and Demography (75 citations). Published in Digital Repository Universitas Negeri Medan (Universitas Negeri Medan).

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w37512137 →

Countries where authors are citing METODOLOGI PENELITIAN BISNIS : Untuk Akuntansi dan Manajemen

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of METODOLOGI PENELITIAN BISNIS : Untuk Akuntansi dan Manajemen. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by METODOLOGI PENELITIAN BISNIS : Untuk Akuntansi dan Manajemen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites METODOLOGI PENELITIAN BISNIS : Untuk Akuntansi dan Manajemen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing METODOLOGI PENELITIAN BISNIS : Untuk Akuntansi dan Manajemen

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of METODOLOGI PENELITIAN BISNIS : Untuk Akuntansi dan Manajemen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the METODOLOGI PENELITIAN BISNIS : Untuk Akuntansi dan Manajemen.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w37512137.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026