Intercropping Its Importance And Research Needs Part 1. Competition And Yield Advantages Vol-32
- Authors
- R. W. Willey
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w3656295 →Countries where authors are citing Intercropping Its Importance And Research Needs Part 1. Competition And Yield Advantages Vol-32
This map shows the geographic impact of Intercropping Its Importance And Research Needs Part 1. Competition And Yield Advantages Vol-32. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Intercropping Its Importance And Research Needs Part 1. Competition And Yield Advantages Vol-32 with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Intercropping Its Importance And Research Needs Part 1. Competition And Yield Advantages Vol-32 more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Intercropping Its Importance And Research Needs Part 1. Competition And Yield Advantages Vol-32
This network shows the impact of Intercropping Its Importance And Research Needs Part 1. Competition And Yield Advantages Vol-32. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Intercropping Its Importance And Research Needs Part 1. Competition And Yield Advantages Vol-32.
About Intercropping Its Importance And Research Needs Part 1. Competition And Yield Advantages Vol-32
This paper, published in 1979, received 773 indexed citations . Written by R. W. Willey covering the research area of Agronomy and Crop Science. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Agronomy and Crop Science (730 citations), Plant Science (539 citations) and Forestry (334 citations).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w3656295.