Tre test clinici di ricerca e produzione lessicale: taratura su soggetti normali
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w3645967 →Countries where authors are citing Tre test clinici di ricerca e produzione lessicale: taratura su soggetti normali
This map shows the geographic impact of Tre test clinici di ricerca e produzione lessicale: taratura su soggetti normali. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tre test clinici di ricerca e produzione lessicale: taratura su soggetti normali with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tre test clinici di ricerca e produzione lessicale: taratura su soggetti normali more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Tre test clinici di ricerca e produzione lessicale: taratura su soggetti normali
This network shows the impact of Tre test clinici di ricerca e produzione lessicale: taratura su soggetti normali. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Tre test clinici di ricerca e produzione lessicale: taratura su soggetti normali.
About Tre test clinici di ricerca e produzione lessicale: taratura su soggetti normali
This paper, published in 1986, received 508 indexed citations . Written by Costanza Papagno, Marcella Laiacona, Giuseppe Vallar and S Cappa covering the research area of Artificial Intelligence. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Cognitive Neuroscience (250 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (183 citations) and Neurology (119 citations).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w3645967.