Compilation of legal limits for hazardous substances in fish and fishery products.
Impact in
- Pollution 540
Classified as
- Authors
- Cornelia E. Nauen
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w34646330 →Countries where authors are citing Compilation of legal limits for hazardous substances in fish and fishery products.
This map shows the geographic impact of Compilation of legal limits for hazardous substances in fish and fishery products.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Compilation of legal limits for hazardous substances in fish and fishery products. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Compilation of legal limits for hazardous substances in fish and fishery products. more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Compilation of legal limits for hazardous substances in fish and fishery products.
This network shows the impact of Compilation of legal limits for hazardous substances in fish and fishery products.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Compilation of legal limits for hazardous substances in fish and fishery products..
About Compilation of legal limits for hazardous substances in fish and fishery products.
This paper, published in 1983, received 769 indexed citations . Written by Cornelia E. Nauen covering the research area of Food Science. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (562 citations), Pollution (540 citations), Water Science and Technology (168 citations), Aquatic Science (134 citations) and Ecology (50 citations).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w34646330.