Cooperative learning : increasing college faculty instructional productivity
- Journal
- Bibliothèque et Archives nationales du Québec (Québec government)
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w34404850 →Countries where authors are citing Cooperative learning : increasing college faculty instructional productivity
This map shows the geographic impact of Cooperative learning : increasing college faculty instructional productivity. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cooperative learning : increasing college faculty instructional productivity with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cooperative learning : increasing college faculty instructional productivity more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Cooperative learning : increasing college faculty instructional productivity
This network shows the impact of Cooperative learning : increasing college faculty instructional productivity. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Cooperative learning : increasing college faculty instructional productivity.
About Cooperative learning : increasing college faculty instructional productivity
This paper, published in 1991, received 828 indexed citations . Written by David W. Johnson, Roger T. Johnson and Karl A. Smith covering the research area of Developmental and Educational Psychology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Education (524 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (294 citations) and Media Technology (165 citations). Published in Bibliothèque et Archives nationales du Québec (Québec government).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w34404850.