Uncommon Understanding: Development and Disorders of Language Comprehension in Children

517 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1997, received 517 indexed citations. Written by Dorothy Bishop covering the research area of Developmental and Educational Psychology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Developmental and Educational Psychology (454 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (241 citations) and Clinical Psychology (79 citations). Published in Medical Entomology and Zoology.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w33191785 →

Countries where authors are citing Uncommon Understanding: Development and Disorders of Language Comprehension in Children

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Uncommon Understanding: Development and Disorders of Language Comprehension in Children. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Uncommon Understanding: Development and Disorders of Language Comprehension in Children with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Uncommon Understanding: Development and Disorders of Language Comprehension in Children more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Uncommon Understanding: Development and Disorders of Language Comprehension in Children

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Uncommon Understanding: Development and Disorders of Language Comprehension in Children. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Uncommon Understanding: Development and Disorders of Language Comprehension in Children.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w33191785.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026