Oligopoly Pricing: Old Ideas and New Tools
Impact in
- Marketing 321
Classified as
- Authors
- Xavier Vives
- Journal
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w3303595 →Countries where authors are citing Oligopoly Pricing: Old Ideas and New Tools
This map shows the geographic impact of Oligopoly Pricing: Old Ideas and New Tools. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Oligopoly Pricing: Old Ideas and New Tools with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Oligopoly Pricing: Old Ideas and New Tools more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Oligopoly Pricing: Old Ideas and New Tools
This network shows the impact of Oligopoly Pricing: Old Ideas and New Tools. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Oligopoly Pricing: Old Ideas and New Tools.
About Oligopoly Pricing: Old Ideas and New Tools
This paper, published in 1999, received 936 indexed citations . Written by Xavier Vives covering the research area of Economics and Econometrics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Economics and Econometrics (703 citations), Marketing (321 citations), Management Science and Operations Research (293 citations), Strategy and Management (283 citations) and Management Information Systems (125 citations). Published in RePEc: Research Papers in Economics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w3303595.