The cancer/testis genes: review, standardization, and commentary.

560 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2004, received 560 indexed citations. Written by Matthew J. Scanlan, Andrew J.G. Simpson and Lloyd J. Old covering the research area of Immunology and Molecular Biology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Immunology (399 citations), Molecular Biology (379 citations) and Oncology (144 citations). Published in PubMed.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w32315140 →

Countries where authors are citing The cancer/testis genes: review, standardization, and commentary.

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of The cancer/testis genes: review, standardization, and commentary.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The cancer/testis genes: review, standardization, and commentary. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The cancer/testis genes: review, standardization, and commentary. more than expected).

Fields of papers citing The cancer/testis genes: review, standardization, and commentary.

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of The cancer/testis genes: review, standardization, and commentary.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The cancer/testis genes: review, standardization, and commentary..

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w32315140.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026