Property Rights and Economic Theory: A Survey of Recent Literature
Impact in
Classified as
- Journal
- Journal of Economic Literature
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w3162142 →Countries where authors are citing Property Rights and Economic Theory: A Survey of Recent Literature
This map shows the geographic impact of Property Rights and Economic Theory: A Survey of Recent Literature. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Property Rights and Economic Theory: A Survey of Recent Literature with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Property Rights and Economic Theory: A Survey of Recent Literature more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Property Rights and Economic Theory: A Survey of Recent Literature
This network shows the impact of Property Rights and Economic Theory: A Survey of Recent Literature. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Property Rights and Economic Theory: A Survey of Recent Literature.
About Property Rights and Economic Theory: A Survey of Recent Literature
This paper, published in 1972, received 596 indexed citations . Written by Eirik G. Furubotn and Svetozar Pejovich covering the research area of General Economics, Econometrics and Finance and Economics and Econometrics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Economics and Econometrics (277 citations), Strategy and Management (127 citations), Sociology and Political Science (125 citations), Accounting (111 citations) and Political Science and International Relations (76 citations). Published in Journal of Economic Literature.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w3162142.