Gene therapy clinical trials worldwide to 2017: An update

586 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2018, received 586 indexed citations. Written by Samantha L. Ginn, Anais K. Amaya, Ian E. Alexander and Michael Edelstein covering the research area of Oncology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Molecular Biology (465 citations), Genetics (309 citations) and Oncology (86 citations). Published in The Journal of Gene Medicine.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/10.1002/jgm.3015 →

Countries where authors are citing Gene therapy clinical trials worldwide to 2017: An update

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Gene therapy clinical trials worldwide to 2017: An update. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gene therapy clinical trials worldwide to 2017: An update with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gene therapy clinical trials worldwide to 2017: An update more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Gene therapy clinical trials worldwide to 2017: An update

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Gene therapy clinical trials worldwide to 2017: An update. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Gene therapy clinical trials worldwide to 2017: An update.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1002/jgm.3015.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026