Turbulence models and their application in hydraulics - A state of the art review
- Authors
- William Rodi
- Journal
- NASA STI/Recon Technical Report A
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w3141305 →Countries where authors are citing Turbulence models and their application in hydraulics - A state of the art review
This map shows the geographic impact of Turbulence models and their application in hydraulics - A state of the art review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Turbulence models and their application in hydraulics - A state of the art review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Turbulence models and their application in hydraulics - A state of the art review more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Turbulence models and their application in hydraulics - A state of the art review
This network shows the impact of Turbulence models and their application in hydraulics - A state of the art review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Turbulence models and their application in hydraulics - A state of the art review.
About Turbulence models and their application in hydraulics - A state of the art review
This paper, published in 1980, received 701 indexed citations . Written by William Rodi covering the research area of Civil and Structural Engineering and Mechanical Engineering. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Computational Mechanics (273 citations), Ecology (194 citations) and Earth-Surface Processes (162 citations). Published in NASA STI/Recon Technical Report A.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w3141305.