Evidence-based psychotherapies for children and adolescents
Impact in
Classified as
- Authors
- Alan E. KazdinJohn R. Weisz
- Journal
- Guilford Press eBooks
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w3131687 →Countries where authors are citing Evidence-based psychotherapies for children and adolescents
This map shows the geographic impact of Evidence-based psychotherapies for children and adolescents. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Evidence-based psychotherapies for children and adolescents with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Evidence-based psychotherapies for children and adolescents more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Evidence-based psychotherapies for children and adolescents
This network shows the impact of Evidence-based psychotherapies for children and adolescents. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Evidence-based psychotherapies for children and adolescents.
About Evidence-based psychotherapies for children and adolescents
This paper, published in 2003, received 810 indexed citations . Written by Alan E. Kazdin and John R. Weisz covering the research area of Clinical Psychology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Clinical Psychology (684 citations), Social Psychology (181 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (144 citations), Education (142 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (130 citations). Published in Guilford Press eBooks.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w3131687.