An improved technique for clearing and staining plant tissues for detection of nematodes.
- Authors
- T. KirkpatrickK. R. Barker
- Journal
- PubMed
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w31009580 →Countries where authors are citing An improved technique for clearing and staining plant tissues for detection of nematodes.
This map shows the geographic impact of An improved technique for clearing and staining plant tissues for detection of nematodes.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by An improved technique for clearing and staining plant tissues for detection of nematodes. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites An improved technique for clearing and staining plant tissues for detection of nematodes. more than expected).
Fields of papers citing An improved technique for clearing and staining plant tissues for detection of nematodes.
This network shows the impact of An improved technique for clearing and staining plant tissues for detection of nematodes.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the An improved technique for clearing and staining plant tissues for detection of nematodes..
About An improved technique for clearing and staining plant tissues for detection of nematodes.
This paper, published in 1983, received 698 indexed citations . Written by T. Kirkpatrick and K. R. Barker covering the research area of Plant Science. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Plant Science (692 citations), Insect Science (112 citations) and Agronomy and Crop Science (53 citations). Published in PubMed.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w31009580.