The Hyper Suprime-Cam SSP Survey: Overview and survey design
Impact in
Classified as
- Journal
- RECERCAT (Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya)
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w3099357154 →Countries where authors are citing The Hyper Suprime-Cam SSP Survey: Overview and survey design
This map shows the geographic impact of The Hyper Suprime-Cam SSP Survey: Overview and survey design. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The Hyper Suprime-Cam SSP Survey: Overview and survey design with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Hyper Suprime-Cam SSP Survey: Overview and survey design more than expected).
Fields of papers citing The Hyper Suprime-Cam SSP Survey: Overview and survey design
This network shows the impact of The Hyper Suprime-Cam SSP Survey: Overview and survey design. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The Hyper Suprime-Cam SSP Survey: Overview and survey design.
About The Hyper Suprime-Cam SSP Survey: Overview and survey design
This paper, published in 2018, received 681 indexed citations . Written by Hiroaki Aihara, N. Arimoto, R. Armstrong, Stéphane Arnouts, Neta A. Bahcall, Steven J. Bickerton, James Bosch, Kevin A. Bundy, Peter Lawrence Capak and J. H. H. Chan covering the research area of Instrumentation. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Astronomy and Astrophysics (585 citations), Instrumentation (14 citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (6 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (3 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (1 citation). Published in RECERCAT (Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w3099357154.