Antioxidant activity, phenol and flavonoid contents of 13 citrus species peels and tissues.
- Journal
- PubMed
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w3099259 →Countries where authors are citing Antioxidant activity, phenol and flavonoid contents of 13 citrus species peels and tissues.
This map shows the geographic impact of Antioxidant activity, phenol and flavonoid contents of 13 citrus species peels and tissues.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Antioxidant activity, phenol and flavonoid contents of 13 citrus species peels and tissues. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Antioxidant activity, phenol and flavonoid contents of 13 citrus species peels and tissues. more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Antioxidant activity, phenol and flavonoid contents of 13 citrus species peels and tissues.
This network shows the impact of Antioxidant activity, phenol and flavonoid contents of 13 citrus species peels and tissues.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Antioxidant activity, phenol and flavonoid contents of 13 citrus species peels and tissues..
About Antioxidant activity, phenol and flavonoid contents of 13 citrus species peels and tissues.
This paper, published in 2009, received 473 indexed citations . Written by Kamran Ghasemi and Mohammad Ali Ebrahimzadeh covering the research area of Plant Science, Biochemistry and Food Science. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Biochemistry (262 citations), Plant Science (201 citations) and Food Science (193 citations). Published in PubMed.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w3099259.