2 Models for gapped boundaries and domain walls
- Authors
- Alexei KitaevLiang Kong
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w30567098 →Countries where authors are citing 2 Models for gapped boundaries and domain walls
This map shows the geographic impact of 2 Models for gapped boundaries and domain walls. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by 2 Models for gapped boundaries and domain walls with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites 2 Models for gapped boundaries and domain walls more than expected).
Fields of papers citing 2 Models for gapped boundaries and domain walls
This network shows the impact of 2 Models for gapped boundaries and domain walls. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the 2 Models for gapped boundaries and domain walls.
About 2 Models for gapped boundaries and domain walls
This paper, published in 2016, received 235 indexed citations . Written by Alexei Kitaev and Liang Kong covering the research area of Condensed Matter Physics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Geometry and Topology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (193 citations), Condensed Matter Physics (90 citations) and Geometry and Topology (66 citations).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w30567098.