Educational Research: Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Approaches

3.3k indexed citations
published 2007
Journal
Medical Entomology and Zoology

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w29700465 →

Countries where authors are citing Educational Research: Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Approaches

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Educational Research: Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Approaches. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Educational Research: Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Approaches with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Educational Research: Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Approaches more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Educational Research: Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Approaches

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Educational Research: Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Approaches. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Educational Research: Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Approaches.

About Educational Research: Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Approaches

This paper, published in 2007, received 3.3k indexed citations . Written by R. Burke Johnson and Larry B. Christensen. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Education (1.8k citations), Sociology and Political Science (501 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (426 citations). Published in Medical Entomology and Zoology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w29700465.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026