Determinants of perceived fairness of performance evaluations
Impact in
Classified as
- Journal
- Journal of Applied Psychology
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w2962392 →Countries where authors are citing Determinants of perceived fairness of performance evaluations
This map shows the geographic impact of Determinants of perceived fairness of performance evaluations. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Determinants of perceived fairness of performance evaluations with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Determinants of perceived fairness of performance evaluations more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Determinants of perceived fairness of performance evaluations
This network shows the impact of Determinants of perceived fairness of performance evaluations. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Determinants of perceived fairness of performance evaluations.
About Determinants of perceived fairness of performance evaluations
This paper, published in 1986, received 508 indexed citations . covering the research area of Applied Psychology, Management Information Systems and Management Science and Operations Research. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (345 citations), Sociology and Political Science (150 citations), Management Information Systems (110 citations), Social Psychology (82 citations) and Gender Studies (58 citations). Published in Journal of Applied Psychology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w2962392.