Handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change: An empirical analysis
- Authors
- Allen E. BerginSol L. Garfield
- Journal
- DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library)
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w29371641 →Countries where authors are citing Handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change: An empirical analysis
This map shows the geographic impact of Handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change: An empirical analysis. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change: An empirical analysis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change: An empirical analysis more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change: An empirical analysis
This network shows the impact of Handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change: An empirical analysis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change: An empirical analysis.
About Handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change: An empirical analysis
This paper, published in 1971, received 851 indexed citations . Written by Allen E. Bergin and Sol L. Garfield. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Clinical Psychology (580 citations), Social Psychology (293 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (131 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (107 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (90 citations). Published in DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w29371641.