The Bark and Ambrosia Beetles of North and Central America (Coleoptera: Scolytidae), a Taxonomic Monograph
- Authors
- Stephen L. Wood
- Journal
- Biodiversity Heritage Library (Smithsonian Institution)
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w2860451 →Countries where authors are citing The Bark and Ambrosia Beetles of North and Central America (Coleoptera: Scolytidae), a Taxonomic Monograph
This map shows the geographic impact of The Bark and Ambrosia Beetles of North and Central America (Coleoptera: Scolytidae), a Taxonomic Monograph. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The Bark and Ambrosia Beetles of North and Central America (Coleoptera: Scolytidae), a Taxonomic Monograph with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Bark and Ambrosia Beetles of North and Central America (Coleoptera: Scolytidae), a Taxonomic Monograph more than expected).
Fields of papers citing The Bark and Ambrosia Beetles of North and Central America (Coleoptera: Scolytidae), a Taxonomic Monograph
This network shows the impact of The Bark and Ambrosia Beetles of North and Central America (Coleoptera: Scolytidae), a Taxonomic Monograph. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The Bark and Ambrosia Beetles of North and Central America (Coleoptera: Scolytidae), a Taxonomic Monograph.
About The Bark and Ambrosia Beetles of North and Central America (Coleoptera: Scolytidae), a Taxonomic Monograph
This paper, published in 1982, received 949 indexed citations . Written by Stephen L. Wood covering the research area of Insect Science and Ecology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Ecology (867 citations), Insect Science (781 citations) and Genetics (203 citations). Published in Biodiversity Heritage Library (Smithsonian Institution).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w2860451.