Psycholinguistics: Experiments in spontaneous speech
Impact in
- Authors
- Frieda Goldman-Eisler
- Journal
- MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society)
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w2771464 →Countries where authors are citing Psycholinguistics: Experiments in spontaneous speech
This map shows the geographic impact of Psycholinguistics: Experiments in spontaneous speech. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Psycholinguistics: Experiments in spontaneous speech with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Psycholinguistics: Experiments in spontaneous speech more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Psycholinguistics: Experiments in spontaneous speech
This network shows the impact of Psycholinguistics: Experiments in spontaneous speech. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Psycholinguistics: Experiments in spontaneous speech.
About Psycholinguistics: Experiments in spontaneous speech
This paper, published in 1968, received 785 indexed citations . Written by Frieda Goldman-Eisler. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (326 citations), Language and Linguistics (278 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (248 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (226 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (178 citations). Published in MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w2771464.