Handbook on impact evaluation: quantitative methods and practices
Impact in
Classified as
- Authors
- Marc Marí-Dell’Olmo
- Journal
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w2751445 →Countries where authors are citing Handbook on impact evaluation: quantitative methods and practices
This map shows the geographic impact of Handbook on impact evaluation: quantitative methods and practices. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Handbook on impact evaluation: quantitative methods and practices with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Handbook on impact evaluation: quantitative methods and practices more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Handbook on impact evaluation: quantitative methods and practices
This network shows the impact of Handbook on impact evaluation: quantitative methods and practices. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Handbook on impact evaluation: quantitative methods and practices.
About Handbook on impact evaluation: quantitative methods and practices
This paper, published in 2011, received 470 indexed citations . Written by Marc Marí-Dell’Olmo covering the research area of Management Science and Operations Research. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Economics and Econometrics (165 citations), Safety Research (97 citations), General Agricultural and Biological Sciences (94 citations), Soil Science (76 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (72 citations). Published in SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w2751445.