Cryo-EM structures of amyloid-β 42 filaments from human brains

310 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2022, received 310 indexed citations. Written by Yang Yang, Diana Arseni, Wenjuan Zhang, Melissa Huang, Sofia Lövestam, Manuel Schweighauser, Abhay Kotecha, Alexey G. Murzin, Sew‐Yeu Peak‐Chew and Jennifer A. Macdonald covering the research area of Molecular Biology, Physiology and Neurology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Physiology (221 citations), Molecular Biology (188 citations) and Computational Theory and Mathematics (40 citations). Published in UCL Discovery (University College London).

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w27011112 →

Countries where authors are citing Cryo-EM structures of amyloid-β 42 filaments from human brains

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Cryo-EM structures of amyloid-β 42 filaments from human brains. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cryo-EM structures of amyloid-β 42 filaments from human brains with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cryo-EM structures of amyloid-β 42 filaments from human brains more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Cryo-EM structures of amyloid-β 42 filaments from human brains

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Cryo-EM structures of amyloid-β 42 filaments from human brains. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Cryo-EM structures of amyloid-β 42 filaments from human brains.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w27011112.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026