Why Nouns are Learned Before Verbs : Linguistic Relativity versus Natural Partitioning
- Authors
- Dedre Gentner
- Journal
- Language
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w19364769 →Countries where authors are citing Why Nouns are Learned Before Verbs : Linguistic Relativity versus Natural Partitioning
This map shows the geographic impact of Why Nouns are Learned Before Verbs : Linguistic Relativity versus Natural Partitioning. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Why Nouns are Learned Before Verbs : Linguistic Relativity versus Natural Partitioning with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Why Nouns are Learned Before Verbs : Linguistic Relativity versus Natural Partitioning more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Why Nouns are Learned Before Verbs : Linguistic Relativity versus Natural Partitioning
This network shows the impact of Why Nouns are Learned Before Verbs : Linguistic Relativity versus Natural Partitioning. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Why Nouns are Learned Before Verbs : Linguistic Relativity versus Natural Partitioning.
About Why Nouns are Learned Before Verbs : Linguistic Relativity versus Natural Partitioning
This paper, published in 1982, received 655 indexed citations . Written by Dedre Gentner covering the research area of Language and Linguistics, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Artificial Intelligence. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Developmental and Educational Psychology (509 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (168 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (151 citations). Published in Language.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w19364769.