Effects of the new anti-lymphocytic peptide cyclosporin A in animals.
- Journal
- PubMed
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w19327588 →Countries where authors are citing Effects of the new anti-lymphocytic peptide cyclosporin A in animals.
This map shows the geographic impact of Effects of the new anti-lymphocytic peptide cyclosporin A in animals.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Effects of the new anti-lymphocytic peptide cyclosporin A in animals. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Effects of the new anti-lymphocytic peptide cyclosporin A in animals. more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Effects of the new anti-lymphocytic peptide cyclosporin A in animals.
This network shows the impact of Effects of the new anti-lymphocytic peptide cyclosporin A in animals.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Effects of the new anti-lymphocytic peptide cyclosporin A in animals..
About Effects of the new anti-lymphocytic peptide cyclosporin A in animals.
This paper, published in 1977, received 584 indexed citations . Written by J. F. Borel, Camille Feurer and H. Stähelin covering the research area of Emergency Medical Services. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Molecular Biology (182 citations), Immunology (160 citations) and Surgery (101 citations). Published in PubMed.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w19327588.