Nickel: A Review of Its Sources and Environmental Toxicology
Impact in
- Pollution 242
Classified as
- Authors
- M CempelGrażyna Nikel
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w16363464 →Countries where authors are citing Nickel: A Review of Its Sources and Environmental Toxicology
This map shows the geographic impact of Nickel: A Review of Its Sources and Environmental Toxicology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nickel: A Review of Its Sources and Environmental Toxicology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nickel: A Review of Its Sources and Environmental Toxicology more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Nickel: A Review of Its Sources and Environmental Toxicology
This network shows the impact of Nickel: A Review of Its Sources and Environmental Toxicology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Nickel: A Review of Its Sources and Environmental Toxicology.
About Nickel: A Review of Its Sources and Environmental Toxicology
This paper, published in 2006, received 606 indexed citations . Written by M Cempel and Grażyna Nikel covering the research area of Pollution and Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Pollution (242 citations), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (197 citations), Water Science and Technology (139 citations), Plant Science (77 citations) and Analytical Chemistry (71 citations). Published in Polish Journal of Environmental Studies.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w16363464.