Nursing research : the application of qualitative approaches
Impact in
- Authors
- Janice M. MorsePeggy‐Anne Field
- Journal
- Medical Entomology and Zoology
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w1529531045 →Countries where authors are citing Nursing research : the application of qualitative approaches
This map shows the geographic impact of Nursing research : the application of qualitative approaches. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nursing research : the application of qualitative approaches with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nursing research : the application of qualitative approaches more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Nursing research : the application of qualitative approaches
This network shows the impact of Nursing research : the application of qualitative approaches. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Nursing research : the application of qualitative approaches.
About Nursing research : the application of qualitative approaches
This paper, published in 1996, received 929 indexed citations . Written by Janice M. Morse and Peggy‐Anne Field. It is primarily cited by scholars working on General Health Professions (256 citations), Sociology and Political Science (166 citations), Clinical Psychology (141 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (120 citations) and Education (115 citations). Published in Medical Entomology and Zoology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w1529531045.