Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning : synthesis and perspectives
Impact in
- Ecology 73
Classified as
- Journal
- Oxford University Press eBooks
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w1500048837 →Countries where authors are citing Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning : synthesis and perspectives
This map shows the geographic impact of Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning : synthesis and perspectives. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning : synthesis and perspectives with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning : synthesis and perspectives more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning : synthesis and perspectives
This network shows the impact of Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning : synthesis and perspectives. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning : synthesis and perspectives.
About Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning : synthesis and perspectives
This paper, published in 2002, received 931 indexed citations . Written by Michel Loreau, Shahid Naeem and Pablo Inchausti covering the research area of Nature and Landscape Conservation. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Nature and Landscape Conservation (329 citations), Ecology (73 citations), Global and Planetary Change (63 citations), Oceanography (57 citations) and Soil Science (52 citations). Published in Oxford University Press eBooks.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w1500048837.