Reasoning, learning, and action : individual and organizational

481 indexed citations
published 1982
Journal
Virtual Defense Library (Ministerio de Defensa)

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w13185608 →

Countries where authors are citing Reasoning, learning, and action : individual and organizational

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Reasoning, learning, and action : individual and organizational. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Reasoning, learning, and action : individual and organizational with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Reasoning, learning, and action : individual and organizational more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Reasoning, learning, and action : individual and organizational

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Reasoning, learning, and action : individual and organizational. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Reasoning, learning, and action : individual and organizational.

About Reasoning, learning, and action : individual and organizational

This paper, published in 1982, received 481 indexed citations . Written by Chris Argyris. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (150 citations), Strategy and Management (103 citations) and Management Science and Operations Research (99 citations). Published in Virtual Defense Library (Ministerio de Defensa).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w13185608.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026