A Review of Research on School Field Trips and Their Value in Education.
- Authors
- Teresa Franklin
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w11880196 →Countries where authors are citing A Review of Research on School Field Trips and Their Value in Education.
This map shows the geographic impact of A Review of Research on School Field Trips and Their Value in Education.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A Review of Research on School Field Trips and Their Value in Education. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A Review of Research on School Field Trips and Their Value in Education. more than expected).
Fields of papers citing A Review of Research on School Field Trips and Their Value in Education.
This network shows the impact of A Review of Research on School Field Trips and Their Value in Education.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the A Review of Research on School Field Trips and Their Value in Education..
About A Review of Research on School Field Trips and Their Value in Education.
This paper, published in 2014, received 218 indexed citations . Written by Teresa Franklin covering the research area of Museology, General Agricultural and Biological Sciences and Speech and Hearing. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Education (81 citations), Social Psychology (65 citations) and Museology (46 citations). Published in The International Journal of Environmental and Science Education.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w11880196.