People, Parks and Poverty: Political Ecology and Biodiversity Conservation
- Political Science and International Relations
- General Agricultural and Biological Sciences
- Global and Planetary Change
- Authors
- William M. AdamsJon Hutton
- Journal
- Conservation and Society
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w11861953 →Countries where authors are citing People, Parks and Poverty: Political Ecology and Biodiversity Conservation
This map shows the geographic impact of People, Parks and Poverty: Political Ecology and Biodiversity Conservation. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by People, Parks and Poverty: Political Ecology and Biodiversity Conservation with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites People, Parks and Poverty: Political Ecology and Biodiversity Conservation more than expected).
Fields of papers citing People, Parks and Poverty: Political Ecology and Biodiversity Conservation
This network shows the impact of People, Parks and Poverty: Political Ecology and Biodiversity Conservation. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the People, Parks and Poverty: Political Ecology and Biodiversity Conservation.
About People, Parks and Poverty: Political Ecology and Biodiversity Conservation
This paper, published in 2007, received 593 indexed citations . Written by William M. Adams and Jon Hutton covering the research area of Political Science and International Relations, General Agricultural and Biological Sciences and Global and Planetary Change. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Global and Planetary Change (409 citations), Ecology (163 citations) and Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (143 citations). Published in Conservation and Society.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w11861953.