Introduction to the theory of coherence and polarization of light

593 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2007, received 593 indexed citations. Written by Emil Wolf covering the research area of Biomedical Engineering, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Electrical and Electronic Engineering. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (476 citations), Biomedical Engineering (300 citations) and Electrical and Electronic Engineering (147 citations). Published in CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research).

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w6121836 →

Countries where authors are citing Introduction to the theory of coherence and polarization of light

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Introduction to the theory of coherence and polarization of light. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Introduction to the theory of coherence and polarization of light with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Introduction to the theory of coherence and polarization of light more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Introduction to the theory of coherence and polarization of light

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Introduction to the theory of coherence and polarization of light. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Introduction to the theory of coherence and polarization of light.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w6121836.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026