The feminist standpoint theory reader : intellectual andpolitical controversies

908 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2004, received 908 indexed citations. Written by Sandra Harding covering the research area of Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science and History and Philosophy of Science. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Sociology and Political Science (480 citations), Gender Studies (227 citations) and Education (139 citations). Published in Routledge eBooks.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w11566394 →

Countries where authors are citing The feminist standpoint theory reader : intellectual andpolitical controversies

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of The feminist standpoint theory reader : intellectual andpolitical controversies. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The feminist standpoint theory reader : intellectual andpolitical controversies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The feminist standpoint theory reader : intellectual andpolitical controversies more than expected).

Fields of papers citing The feminist standpoint theory reader : intellectual andpolitical controversies

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of The feminist standpoint theory reader : intellectual andpolitical controversies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The feminist standpoint theory reader : intellectual andpolitical controversies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w11566394.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026