Machine learning with adversaries: byzantine tolerant gradient descent

582 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2017, received 582 indexed citations. Written by Peva Blanchard, El Mahdi El Mhamdi, Rachid Guerraoui and Julien Stainer covering the research area of Artificial Intelligence and Computer Networks and Communications. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Artificial Intelligence (544 citations), Computer Networks and Communications (113 citations) and Information Systems (84 citations). Published in Neural Information Processing Systems.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w11081906 →

Countries where authors are citing Machine learning with adversaries: byzantine tolerant gradient descent

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Machine learning with adversaries: byzantine tolerant gradient descent. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Machine learning with adversaries: byzantine tolerant gradient descent with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Machine learning with adversaries: byzantine tolerant gradient descent more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Machine learning with adversaries: byzantine tolerant gradient descent

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Machine learning with adversaries: byzantine tolerant gradient descent. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Machine learning with adversaries: byzantine tolerant gradient descent.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w11081906.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026