Manual for the Minnesota Satisfaction Questionnaire.

1.9k indexed citations
published 1967

Countries where authors are citing Manual for the Minnesota Satisfaction Questionnaire.

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Manual for the Minnesota Satisfaction Questionnaire.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Manual for the Minnesota Satisfaction Questionnaire. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Manual for the Minnesota Satisfaction Questionnaire. more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Manual for the Minnesota Satisfaction Questionnaire.

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Manual for the Minnesota Satisfaction Questionnaire.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Manual for the Minnesota Satisfaction Questionnaire..

About Manual for the Minnesota Satisfaction Questionnaire.

This paper, published in 1967, received 1.9k indexed citations . Written by David Weiss, René V. Dawis and George W. England. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (1.1k citations), Social Psychology (613 citations) and General Health Professions (406 citations).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w11035349.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026