4 million neonatal deaths: When? Where? Why? Neonatal survival 1.
Impact in
Classified as
- Authors
- Simon CousensJelka Zupan
- Journal
- The Lancet
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w10775389 →Countries where authors are citing 4 million neonatal deaths: When? Where? Why? Neonatal survival 1.
This map shows the geographic impact of 4 million neonatal deaths: When? Where? Why? Neonatal survival 1.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by 4 million neonatal deaths: When? Where? Why? Neonatal survival 1. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites 4 million neonatal deaths: When? Where? Why? Neonatal survival 1. more than expected).
Fields of papers citing 4 million neonatal deaths: When? Where? Why? Neonatal survival 1.
This network shows the impact of 4 million neonatal deaths: When? Where? Why? Neonatal survival 1.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the 4 million neonatal deaths: When? Where? Why? Neonatal survival 1..
About 4 million neonatal deaths: When? Where? Why? Neonatal survival 1.
This paper, published in 2005, received 424 indexed citations . Written by Simon Cousens and Jelka Zupan covering the research area of General Health Professions and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (223 citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (75 citations), General Health Professions (65 citations), Epidemiology (49 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (45 citations). Published in The Lancet.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w10775389.