The Relative Importance of Characters Affecting Genetic Divergence
Impact in
- Plant Science 451
- Forestry 65
- Authors
- Daljit Singh
- Journal
- Indian Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding (The)
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w1070855 →Countries where authors are citing The Relative Importance of Characters Affecting Genetic Divergence
This map shows the geographic impact of The Relative Importance of Characters Affecting Genetic Divergence. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The Relative Importance of Characters Affecting Genetic Divergence with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Relative Importance of Characters Affecting Genetic Divergence more than expected).
Fields of papers citing The Relative Importance of Characters Affecting Genetic Divergence
This network shows the impact of The Relative Importance of Characters Affecting Genetic Divergence. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The Relative Importance of Characters Affecting Genetic Divergence.
About The Relative Importance of Characters Affecting Genetic Divergence
This paper, published in 1981, received 517 indexed citations . Written by Daljit Singh. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Plant Science (451 citations), Forestry (65 citations), Molecular Biology (49 citations), Soil Science (47 citations) and Genetics (42 citations). Published in Indian Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding (The).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w1070855.