ACSM's guidelines for exercise testing and prescription

1.1k indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1995, received 1.1k indexed citations. Written by W. Larry Kenney, Reed Humphrey, Cedric X. Bryant and Donald A. Mahler covering the research area of Orthopedics and Sports Medicine and Complementary and alternative medicine. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Physiology (344 citations), Complementary and alternative medicine (282 citations) and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (217 citations). Published in Bulletin of Miscellaneous Information (Royal Gardens Kew).

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w10133810 →

Countries where authors are citing ACSM's guidelines for exercise testing and prescription

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of ACSM's guidelines for exercise testing and prescription. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by ACSM's guidelines for exercise testing and prescription with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites ACSM's guidelines for exercise testing and prescription more than expected).

Fields of papers citing ACSM's guidelines for exercise testing and prescription

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of ACSM's guidelines for exercise testing and prescription. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the ACSM's guidelines for exercise testing and prescription.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w10133810.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026