Workers' Remitt ances: An Important and Stable Source of External Development Finance
- Authors
- Dilip Ratha
- Journal
- SSRN Electronic Journal
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w10124935 →Countries where authors are citing Workers' Remitt ances: An Important and Stable Source of External Development Finance
This map shows the geographic impact of Workers' Remitt ances: An Important and Stable Source of External Development Finance. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Workers' Remitt ances: An Important and Stable Source of External Development Finance with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Workers' Remitt ances: An Important and Stable Source of External Development Finance more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Workers' Remitt ances: An Important and Stable Source of External Development Finance
This network shows the impact of Workers' Remitt ances: An Important and Stable Source of External Development Finance. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Workers' Remitt ances: An Important and Stable Source of External Development Finance.
About Workers' Remitt ances: An Important and Stable Source of External Development Finance
This paper, published in 2005, received 554 indexed citations . Written by Dilip Ratha covering the research area of Demography, Sociology and Political Science and Development. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Sociology and Political Science (475 citations), Economics and Econometrics (197 citations) and Demography (133 citations). Published in SSRN Electronic Journal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w10124935.