Studies on finely divided wood. Part 1. Extraction of lignin with neutral solvents
Impact in
- Plant Science 199
Classified as
- Authors
- Anders Björkman
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w10111080 →Countries where authors are citing Studies on finely divided wood. Part 1. Extraction of lignin with neutral solvents
This map shows the geographic impact of Studies on finely divided wood. Part 1. Extraction of lignin with neutral solvents. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Studies on finely divided wood. Part 1. Extraction of lignin with neutral solvents with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Studies on finely divided wood. Part 1. Extraction of lignin with neutral solvents more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Studies on finely divided wood. Part 1. Extraction of lignin with neutral solvents
This network shows the impact of Studies on finely divided wood. Part 1. Extraction of lignin with neutral solvents. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Studies on finely divided wood. Part 1. Extraction of lignin with neutral solvents.
About Studies on finely divided wood. Part 1. Extraction of lignin with neutral solvents
This paper, published in 1956, received 522 indexed citations . Written by Anders Björkman covering the research area of Biomedical Engineering. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Biomedical Engineering (447 citations), Plant Science (199 citations), Food Science (160 citations), Molecular Biology (100 citations) and Biomaterials (70 citations).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w10111080.