Brain blood flow measured with intravenous H2(15)O. II. Implementation and validation.
- Journal
- PubMed
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w86683459 →Countries where authors are citing Brain blood flow measured with intravenous H2(15)O. II. Implementation and validation.
This map shows the geographic impact of Brain blood flow measured with intravenous H2(15)O. II. Implementation and validation.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Brain blood flow measured with intravenous H2(15)O. II. Implementation and validation. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Brain blood flow measured with intravenous H2(15)O. II. Implementation and validation. more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Brain blood flow measured with intravenous H2(15)O. II. Implementation and validation.
This network shows the impact of Brain blood flow measured with intravenous H2(15)O. II. Implementation and validation.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Brain blood flow measured with intravenous H2(15)O. II. Implementation and validation..
About Brain blood flow measured with intravenous H2(15)O. II. Implementation and validation.
This paper, published in 1983, received 840 indexed citations . Written by M. E. Raichle, W. R. Wayne Martin, Peter Herscovitch, M. A. Mintun and Joanne Markham covering the research area of Neurology and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (454 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (289 citations) and Neurology (149 citations). Published in PubMed.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w86683459.