Colonial Encounters: Europe and the Native Caribbean 1492-1797
- Authors
- Peter Hulme
- Journal
- Open Access at Essex (University of Essex)
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w74653472 →Countries where authors are citing Colonial Encounters: Europe and the Native Caribbean 1492-1797
This map shows the geographic impact of Colonial Encounters: Europe and the Native Caribbean 1492-1797. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Colonial Encounters: Europe and the Native Caribbean 1492-1797 with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Colonial Encounters: Europe and the Native Caribbean 1492-1797 more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Colonial Encounters: Europe and the Native Caribbean 1492-1797
This network shows the impact of Colonial Encounters: Europe and the Native Caribbean 1492-1797. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Colonial Encounters: Europe and the Native Caribbean 1492-1797.
About Colonial Encounters: Europe and the Native Caribbean 1492-1797
This paper, published in 1986, received 359 indexed citations . Written by Peter Hulme covering the research area of Cultural Studies. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Anthropology (133 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (106 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (93 citations). Published in Open Access at Essex (University of Essex).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w74653472.