Genetic determination of telomere size in humans: a twin study of three age groups.
- Journal
- PubMed
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w55513618 →Countries where authors are citing Genetic determination of telomere size in humans: a twin study of three age groups.
This map shows the geographic impact of Genetic determination of telomere size in humans: a twin study of three age groups.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Genetic determination of telomere size in humans: a twin study of three age groups. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Genetic determination of telomere size in humans: a twin study of three age groups. more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Genetic determination of telomere size in humans: a twin study of three age groups.
This network shows the impact of Genetic determination of telomere size in humans: a twin study of three age groups.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Genetic determination of telomere size in humans: a twin study of three age groups..
About Genetic determination of telomere size in humans: a twin study of three age groups.
This paper, published in 1994, received 608 indexed citations . Written by P. Eline Slagboom, Simone Droog and Dorret I. Boomsma covering the research area of Plant Science and Physiology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Physiology (528 citations), Aging (167 citations) and Molecular Biology (165 citations). Published in PubMed.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w55513618.