Teknik Pengambilan Sampel Umum dalam Metodologi Penelitian: Literature Review
- Authors
- Deri FirmansyahDede Dede
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.55927/jiph.v1i2.937 →Countries where authors are citing Teknik Pengambilan Sampel Umum dalam Metodologi Penelitian: Literature Review
This map shows the geographic impact of Teknik Pengambilan Sampel Umum dalam Metodologi Penelitian: Literature Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Teknik Pengambilan Sampel Umum dalam Metodologi Penelitian: Literature Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Teknik Pengambilan Sampel Umum dalam Metodologi Penelitian: Literature Review more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Teknik Pengambilan Sampel Umum dalam Metodologi Penelitian: Literature Review
This network shows the impact of Teknik Pengambilan Sampel Umum dalam Metodologi Penelitian: Literature Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Teknik Pengambilan Sampel Umum dalam Metodologi Penelitian: Literature Review.
About Teknik Pengambilan Sampel Umum dalam Metodologi Penelitian: Literature Review
This paper, published in 2022, received 150 indexed citations . Written by Deri Firmansyah and Dede Dede. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Education (62 citations), Information Systems (37 citations) and Demography (24 citations).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.55927/jiph.v1i2.937.