Identifying Technology Spillovers and Product Market Rivalry

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1950, received 967 indexed citations. Written by Nicholas Bloom, Mark Schankerman and John Van Reenen covering the research area of Economics and Econometrics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Economics and Econometrics (764 citations), Accounting (252 citations) and Strategy and Management (229 citations). Published in Econometrica.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/10.3982/ecta9466 →

Countries where authors are citing Identifying Technology Spillovers and Product Market Rivalry

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Identifying Technology Spillovers and Product Market Rivalry. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Identifying Technology Spillovers and Product Market Rivalry with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Identifying Technology Spillovers and Product Market Rivalry more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Identifying Technology Spillovers and Product Market Rivalry

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Identifying Technology Spillovers and Product Market Rivalry. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Identifying Technology Spillovers and Product Market Rivalry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.3982/ecta9466.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026